Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 |
1. Sticky:[June] Fighter Damage Reduction - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
Pterry Dactyl Kasterborous wrote: 28 pages. have you figured out this is a dumb way of fixing a non problem? "PVE is too easy so we are going to nerf carriers/supers in a way that ALSO completely nerfs PVP capability" . . . . . . . . . when ...
- by Sullen Decimus - at 2017.06.09 16:38:22
|
2. Sticky:[June] Fighter Damage Reduction - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
Yes lets nerf carriers/supers more because it makes too much sense to be making money off your 3 bil investment. Particularly since a massive portion of the income shown is from people in AFKtars and AFKvexors which will literally be unaffected by...
- by Sullen Decimus - at 2017.06.09 16:37:34
|
3. Nullification and Interdiction - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
baltec1 wrote: T3 would have the ability to adapt without a station or capital/nester and the ability to swap out rigs without destroying them. Cost means nothing to a lot of us but I would expect T3C build costs to drop and the SP loss tosse...
- by Sullen Decimus - at 2017.04.21 19:36:36
|
4. Sticky:[Mini-blog] The Next Steps in Structure Transition - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
Nasar Vyron wrote: I may have read past this, but what about clones (and implants) in those stations? I assume they'll just be moved to the new structure? So I'd assume they will also have an active clone bay module. Very expensive clones that ...
- by Sullen Decimus - at 2017.04.11 17:51:07
|
5. Can we get rid of CSM after the recent PLEX insider trading fiasco? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
This entire thread is ******* hilarious. You're literally spewing **** while shooting yourself in the foot for your own arguments you're presenting. Before I get to that though if we leaked anything why the hell wouldn't we have done it months ago...
- by Sullen Decimus - at 2017.03.30 18:27:08
|
6. Sticky:Dev blog: Introducing Upwell Refineries - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Locke Beulve wrote: Quote: The existing reactions will be converted to new blueprints that enable the reaction process in the new system, and new reactions will include small amounts of ice products in each run to compensate for the lower ...
- by Sullen Decimus - at 2017.03.23 04:15:17
|
7. Nullification and Interdiction - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Now that we have decaying bubbles I want to reopen this forum. here are some general view points. - having nullified travel isn't a bad thing. We recommended having shuttles with nullification as they would still allow easy travel, without bring...
- by Sullen Decimus - at 2017.03.19 17:16:06
|
8. Nullification and Interdiction - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Petit Julot wrote: CSM shouldn't weignt on the metagame, period. Please do whatever very important other thing you may have to do or just have a drink We're asking this to see if there is support to remove it from ships.
- by Sullen Decimus - at 2017.03.19 16:21:32
|
9. Sticky:Dev blog: PLEX Changes On The Way! - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Gogela wrote: Obil Que wrote: Sullen Decimus wrote: SIEGE RED wrote: Interesting, every bit of market data hints more than strongly at a CSM leak prior to this devblog. It was already weird, yet now it's clear. What?? Tinfoil 1:...
- by Sullen Decimus - at 2017.03.16 22:44:14
|
10. Sticky:Dev blog: PLEX Changes On The Way! - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
ApexDynamo wrote: This is probally the dumbest thing ive read all day We are going to change 1 plex into 500 plex but will still cost 500 plex for a 1 month sub, So whats the point in changeing it then? item inventory vault 2,700 plex is 5....
- by Sullen Decimus - at 2017.03.16 17:56:37
|
11. Sticky:Dev blog: PLEX Changes On The Way! - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Allsales Final wrote: Sullen Decimus wrote: SIEGE RED wrote: Interesting, every bit of market data hints more than strongly at a CSM leak prior to this devblog. It was already weird, yet now it's clear. What?? What do you mean "what...
- by Sullen Decimus - at 2017.03.16 17:53:22
|
12. Sticky:Dev blog: PLEX Changes On The Way! - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
SIEGE RED wrote: Interesting, every bit of market data hints more than strongly at a CSM leak prior to this devblog. It was already weird, yet now it's clear. What??
- by Sullen Decimus - at 2017.03.16 16:23:13
|
13. Sticky:Dev blog: PLEX Changes On The Way! - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Manic Velocity wrote: I like the idea of unifying PLEX and Aurum, and the concept of making PLEX more granular in how it is bought and sold. These two things really simplify the mental gymnastics of how PLEX can be used. Good stuff there. But...
- by Sullen Decimus - at 2017.03.16 15:57:23
|
14. Gÿ+ Sullen Decimus for CSM XII Gÿ+ - in CSM Campaigns [original thread]
DeMichael Crimson wrote: Hello, My question - what is your viewpoint regarding Faction standings and as a CSM member, what changes will you propose to CCP pertaining to game mechanics for Faction standings ? Good luck to you in the upcoming C...
- by Sullen Decimus - at 2017.03.07 19:33:59
|
15. Gÿ+ Sullen Decimus for CSM XII Gÿ+ - in CSM Campaigns [original thread]
Orca Platypus wrote: The reason this trash should never be anywhere near CFCSM of CCPL. Trash like him on CSM is the reason #1 to boycott election entirely. Hey CCPL, can we get a vote against the CSM entirely? Drone Regions resident?
- by Sullen Decimus - at 2017.03.01 09:00:22
|
16. Please, fix industry tax in citadels - in Issues, Workarounds & Localization [original thread]
Tipa Riot wrote: Fully agree to that points, the player tax should be independent of the SCI NPC tax. The current system encourages people to setup complexes in high index systems to farm newbies, instead of providing the service in more valuab...
- by Sullen Decimus - at 2017.02.21 19:02:30
|
17. Sticky:[March] Mobile Warp Disruptor changes - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
This seems like a great compromise.
- by Sullen Decimus - at 2017.02.21 17:13:45
|
18. Please, fix industry tax in citadels - in Issues, Workarounds & Localization [original thread]
CCP Nagual wrote: That screenshot was taken on Feb 14? That should be a bug that was fixed today (it lasted 24 hours apparently). So, please ignore that ; ) What about other activities on the ECs? Invention, MR, TR, etc...? Are there perceive...
- by Sullen Decimus - at 2017.02.16 16:31:16
|
19. Please, fix industry tax in citadels - in Issues, Workarounds & Localization [original thread]
Andrew Xadi wrote: is only leads people to come to the wrong assumptions as to what REALLY matters when they're building things. yup, and that's why player tax should be applied to item value, not system cost index, or system cost index sh...
- by Sullen Decimus - at 2017.02.14 15:46:01
|
20. Jin'taan for CSM XII - in CSM Campaigns [original thread]
I would like the fully endorse Jin in his reelection for the CSM. He has been a great asset in not just nullsec items but also the game as a whole. As many current CSM have stated it is better to endorse candidates who will better the game, and ar...
- by Sullen Decimus - at 2017.02.13 19:12:45
|
Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |